F.O.S.
10 hours ago
permalink
8bitfuture:

‘Vacuum Tube’ processor 12x faster than silicone based transistors.
Vacuum tubes were used in computers until around 50 years ago, when transistors were found to be able to be mass produced onto silicon more cheaply and effectively. Now vacuum tube techniques have been used again to create a device able to operate at up to 0.46 terahertz - more than 12 times faster than the latest Ivy Bridge range of processors from Intel which operate up to 3.8Ghz. 

…it is created by etching a tiny cavity in phosphorous-doped silicon. The cavity is bordered by three electrodes: a source, a gate, and a drain. The source and drain are separated by just 150 nanometers, while the gate sits on top. Electrons are emitted from the source thanks to a voltage applied across it and the drain, while the gate controls the electron flow across the cavity.

Because the device is so small in size, the team found they didn’t need a true vacuum to make it work, as the risk of electrons colliding with any atoms in the air is so low at the nanometre scale. This means they would be more suited to cheaper mass production.
This work is of particular interest to NASA and other space agencies, as traditional computers need to be radiation-proofed before leaving Earth’s atmosphere - this wouldn’t be a problem for the new device, potentially saving them time and money by enabling space-ready computers.

8bitfuture:

‘Vacuum Tube’ processor 12x faster than silicone based transistors.

Vacuum tubes were used in computers until around 50 years ago, when transistors were found to be able to be mass produced onto silicon more cheaply and effectively. Now vacuum tube techniques have been used again to create a device able to operate at up to 0.46 terahertz - more than 12 times faster than the latest Ivy Bridge range of processors from Intel which operate up to 3.8Ghz. 

…it is created by etching a tiny cavity in phosphorous-doped silicon. The cavity is bordered by three electrodes: a source, a gate, and a drain. The source and drain are separated by just 150 nanometers, while the gate sits on top. Electrons are emitted from the source thanks to a voltage applied across it and the drain, while the gate controls the electron flow across the cavity.

Because the device is so small in size, the team found they didn’t need a true vacuum to make it work, as the risk of electrons colliding with any atoms in the air is so low at the nanometre scale. This means they would be more suited to cheaper mass production.

This work is of particular interest to NASA and other space agencies, as traditional computers need to be radiation-proofed before leaving Earth’s atmosphere - this wouldn’t be a problem for the new device, potentially saving them time and money by enabling space-ready computers.

(Source: news.sciencemag.org)

Cite Arrow via 8bitfuture
Comments
permalink

megsokay:

immortalnewsspork:

Via @jessradio

Hey Americans, let’s all enjoy our eating and our drinking this weekend, right?

Cite Arrow via occupyourstreets
Comments
Comments
permalink
8bitfuture:

US Police considering arming UAV’s.
Texas law enforcement have revealed they are considering using rubber bullets and tear gas on their Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. 

“Those are things that law enforcement utilizes day in and day out and in certain situations it might be advantageous to have this type of system on the UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle),” McDaniel told The Daily.

The American Civil Liberties Union also claim tasers are being considered on the drones.
New FAA rules mean US Police departments are allowed to operate drones weighing up to 25 pounds (11kg) in US airspace.

8bitfuture:

US Police considering arming UAV’s.

Texas law enforcement have revealed they are considering using rubber bullets and tear gas on their Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. 

“Those are things that law enforcement utilizes day in and day out and in certain situations it might be advantageous to have this type of system on the UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle),” McDaniel told The Daily.

The American Civil Liberties Union also claim tasers are being considered on the drones.

New FAA rules mean US Police departments are allowed to operate drones weighing up to 25 pounds (11kg) in US airspace.

(Source: kurzweilai.net)

Cite Arrow via 8bitfuture
Comments
1 day ago
permalink
…It’s not that the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) doesn’t criminally prosecute people who pay bribes to avoid land-use restrictions on their property. Rather, the feds prefer to bring such cases against people who don’t have access to corporate lobbyists – or even to private lawyers. According to Bureau of Justice statistics, just one in five felony defendants has private counsel…. »The U.S. Department of Double Standards — In These Times
Comments
permalink
Cite Arrow via plastic-train
Comments
permalink
pulsarae:

holy shit. Montreal, today. this is what happens when you ban protesting 

pulsarae:

holy shit. Montreal, today. 
this is what happens when you ban protesting 

Cite Arrow via occupyourstreets
Comments
permalink
occupyallstreets:

Victory: Activist Sue Obama, Judge Rules NDAA Unconstitutional
In a stunning turnaround for an act of Congress, a judge ruled Wednesday that a counterterrorism provision of the National Defense Authorization Act, an annual defense appropriations bill, is unconstitutional. Federal district Judge Katherine B. Forrest issued an injunction against use of the provision on behalf of a group of journalists and activists who had filed suit in March, claiming it would chill free speech./p>
In her decision published Wednesday, Forrest, in the Southern District of New York, ruled that Section 1021 of NDAA was facially unconstitutional — a rare finding — because of the potential that it could violate the 1st Amendment.
“Plaintiffs have stated a more than plausible claim that the statute inappropriately encroaches on their rights under the First Amendment,” she wrote, addressing the constitutional challenge.
Seven individuals, including Pulitzer Prize-winning former New York Times foreign correspondent Chris Hedges, MIT linguist Noam Chomsky and “Pentagon Papers” activist Daniel Ellsberg, had sued President Barack Obama, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, and a host of other government officials, stating they were forced to curtail some of their reporting and activist activities for fear of violating Section 1021. That section prohibits providing substantial support for terrorist groups, but gives little definition of what that means. Environmental activists were also poised to join the suit if it expanded.
The suit demands that Congress cut or reform this section of the law, which allows the U.S. military to indefinitely detain without charges anyone — including U.S. citizens — who may have “substantially supported” terrorists or their “associated forces,” without defining what those terms mean. President Obama signed the bill on Dec 31, 2011, with a signing statement saying that the law was redundant of powers already provided to the government under the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (passed after 9/11), and that these powers would not be used against U.S. citizens. The next administration may decide differently, however.
Source

occupyallstreets:

Victory: Activist Sue Obama, Judge Rules NDAA Unconstitutional

In a stunning turnaround for an act of Congress, a judge ruled Wednesday that a counterterrorism provision of the National Defense Authorization Act, an annual defense appropriations bill, is unconstitutional. Federal district Judge Katherine B. Forrest issued an injunction against use of the provision on behalf of a group of journalists and activists who had filed suit in March, claiming it would chill free speech./p>

In her decision published Wednesday, Forrest, in the Southern District of New York, ruled that Section 1021 of NDAA was facially unconstitutional — a rare finding — because of the potential that it could violate the 1st Amendment.

Plaintiffs have stated a more than plausible claim that the statute inappropriately encroaches on their rights under the First Amendment,” she wrote, addressing the constitutional challenge.

Seven individuals, including Pulitzer Prize-winning former New York Times foreign correspondent Chris Hedges, MIT linguist Noam Chomsky and “Pentagon Papers” activist Daniel Ellsberg, had sued President Barack Obama, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, and a host of other government officials, stating they were forced to curtail some of their reporting and activist activities for fear of violating Section 1021. That section prohibits providing substantial support for terrorist groups, but gives little definition of what that means. Environmental activists were also poised to join the suit if it expanded.

The suit demands that Congress cut or reform this section of the law, which allows the U.S. military to indefinitely detain without charges anyone — including U.S. citizens — who may have “substantially supported” terrorists or their “associated forces,” without defining what those terms mean. President Obama signed the bill on Dec 31, 2011, with a signing statement saying that the law was redundant of powers already provided to the government under the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (passed after 9/11), and that these powers would not be used against U.S. citizens. The next administration may decide differently, however.

Source

Cite Arrow via occupyourstreets
Comments
2 days ago
permalink
Cite Arrow via mainstreamrevolution
Comments
permalink
laughingsquid:

The Internet Defense League: Spreading The Alarm Whenever the Internet is Threatened
Cite Arrow via winneganfake
Comments
permalink

(Source: nazimsesen)

Cite Arrow via mainstreamrevolution
Comments
permalink
cultureofresistance:

This is the secret of propaganda: To totally saturate the person, whom the propaganda wants to lay hold of, with the ideas of the propaganda, without him even noticing that he is being saturated. 
-Paul Watzlawick

cultureofresistance:

This is the secret of propaganda: To totally saturate the person, whom the propaganda wants to lay hold of, with the ideas of the propaganda, without him even noticing that he is being saturated.

-Paul Watzlawick

(Source: socialuprooting)

Cite Arrow via occupyourstreets
Comments
Comments
3 days ago
permalink
nedhepburn:

We’ve raised a generation of mini-Michael Moore-s.
imwithkanye:

Nick takes on Life. This is the best letter from a child I’ve read all day.

nedhepburn:

We’ve raised a generation of mini-Michael Moore-s.

imwithkanye:

Nick takes on Life. This is the best letter from a child I’ve read all day.

Cite Arrow via plastic-train
Comments
3 days ago
permalink

Man vs. Machine: Will Human Workers Become Obsolete? (by PBSNewsHour)

Comments
Powered by Tumblr Designed by:Doinwork